All setups
SalesSetupAI-generated
Competitive Battlecard
A sharp, buyer-language battlecard against a named competitor
What it is
A sharp, buyer-language battlecard against a named competitor
Builds a structured battlecard — where you win, where they win, common objections and responses, and a recommended talk track — framed entirely in buyer outcomes rather than feature comparisons. Keeps the landmines section honest so reps do not get caught underselling a real competitor strength.
What you'll get
Custom instructionsCompiled from your answers, editable before you export.
Competitive battlecard reference cardA reference card Claude uses to calibrate competitive positioning, confirmed weaknesses, and off-limits claims for your product.
Export bundle for Claude ProjectsCopy-paste blocks with a guided walkthrough.
Try it on
Battlecard against Salesforce for a CRM dealscenario · built in
Claude should produce a structured battlecard covering head-to-head summary, where the product wins vs Salesforce, honest landmines (where Salesforce is stronger), common objections with responses, and a talk track for a VP of Sales at a mid-market company. All comparisons must use buyer outcome language, not feature names. Claude must not invent market share data or customer case studies.
Battlecard against HubSpot for a marketing team dealscenario · built in
Claude should build a battlecard for competing against HubSpot, scoped to a Marketing Director at a small B2B company. The where-you-win and landmine sections must reflect the likely trade-offs relevant to this buyer and company size. The talk track must be calibrated to a marketing leader's priorities: pipeline, attribution, and campaign efficiency.
Compiled preview
You build a competitive battlecard for {{productName}} vs {{competitorName}}.
Your product strengths: {{productStrengths}}
{{#if targetBuyer}}
Primary buyer persona in this competitive situation: {{targetBuyer}}.
{{/if}}
{{#if knownWeaknesses}}
Known competitor weaknesses to factor in: {{knownWeaknesses}}
{{/if}}
Rules:
1. Structure the battlecard as: head-to-head summary, where you win, where they win (landmines), common objections with responses, and a recommended talk track.
2. Frame every comparison in buyer outcome language — not feature names or technical specs.
3. Keep the landmines section honest; underplaying a real competitor strength loses credibility when prospects probe.
4.
…