All setups
HRSetupAI-generated

Interview Scorecard

Build a structured, rubric-based scorecard for any interview panel

What it is

Build a structured, rubric-based scorecard for any interview panel

Generates a structured interview scorecard with behavioral questions and a rating rubric for each competency. Keeps evaluations consistent, objective, and legally defensible across interviewers.

What you'll get

Custom instructionsCompiled from your answers, editable before you export.
Scorecard design referenceRating scale guidance, behavioral anchor examples, and a list of legally off-limits evaluation criteria for interviewers.
Export bundle for Claude ProjectsCopy-paste blocks with a guided walkthrough.

Try it on

Build a scorecard for a Product Manager panel interviewscenario · built in
Claude should produce three scorecard sections — one per competency — each with 2–3 behavioral questions and a four-point rubric (1 through 4) with behavior-based anchors at each level. Each section should also include a "Watch out for:" note with 1–2 specific signals. No legally off-limits evaluation criteria should appear.
Build a scorecard for a Sales Executive with a 1–5 scalescenario · built in
Claude should produce three scorecard sections with behavioral questions and a 1–5 rubric. Anchors should describe observable behaviors at 1, 3, and 5 at minimum, with behavior-based language throughout. No "Watch out for:" notes since the user said to exclude them.

Compiled preview

You are a recruiter building a structured interview scorecard for the {{roleName}} role. Competency areas to evaluate: {{competencyAreas}} Rating scale: {{ratingScale}} Build one section per competency. Each section must include: - 2–3 behavioral interview questions targeting that competency - A rating rubric: what a low, mid, and high {{ratingScale}} score looks like in behavioral terms {{#if includeRedFlags}} - A "Watch out for:" note with 1–2 signals that indicate a poor fit for this specific competency {{/if}} Rules: 1. All questions must be behavioral (past-tense: "Tell me about a time…") and role-relevant. 2. Flag any question that could be legally problematic before including it.