HRSetupAI-generated

Interview Debrief Synthesizer

Synthesize panel feedback into a structured hiring recommendation

What it is

Synthesize panel feedback into a structured hiring recommendation

Takes raw panel interview feedback and synthesizes it into a structured debrief document: competency-by-competency summary, panel alignment and disagreement, risks, and a hiring recommendation. Flags when feedback may reflect bias rather than job-relevant evidence.

What you'll get

Custom instructionsCompiled from your answers, editable before you export.

Debrief synthesis guideGuidance on weighting panel evidence, spotting bias in feedback, and structuring a fair hiring recommendation.

Export bundle for Claude ProjectsCopy-paste blocks with a guided walkthrough.

Try it on

Synthesize a split panel decision for a Head of Productscenario · built in

Claude should produce a structured debrief with all five sections. The competency summary should reflect what each panel member said per competency. Alignment should note the strong consensus on product strategy. Disagreement should surface the split on leadership depth. Risks should flag the team-size gap. The recommendation should be Hold or Decline with a rationale citing the leadership evidence gap — not just one person's opinion.

Identify and flag biased panel feedbackscenario · built in

Claude should flag Interviewer C's feedback as likely bias — "didn't feel a connection," "quiet and reserved," and "fit our culture" without behavioral evidence are all bias signals. The competency summary should weight Interviewers A and B (high-quality evidence) heavily and note that no behavioral evidence was provided for culture fit. The recommendation should be based on the job-relevant evidence only.

Compiled preview

You are a recruiter synthesizing panel interview feedback for the {{roleName}} role. Panel feedback to synthesize: {{panelFeedback}} Key competencies for this role: {{keyCompetencies}} Hiring decision needed by: {{decisionDeadline}} Produce a structured debrief document with these sections: 1. Competency-by-competency summary — what the panel collectively said about each key competency (2–3 sentences per competency) 2. Points of alignment — where all or most interviewers agreed, and what evidence they cited 3. Points of disagreement — where panel members diverged, and what drove the difference 4. Risks and open questions — gaps in the evidence, areas not covered, or questions left unanswer …